numvana

Rayleigh Criterion (Diffraction Limit) Calculator

Find the diffraction-limited angular resolution of a lens, telescope, or microscope from its aperture diameter and light wavelength, using θ = 1.22λ/D.

Angular resolution limit
0.923 arcsec
Angular resolution limit (radians)
4.473e-6 rad
Smallest resolvable separation at that distance
4.473 mm

How it works

Any circular aperture — a camera lens, a telescope mirror, a microscope objective, even the eye's pupil — blurs a point of light into a small diffraction pattern (an Airy disk) rather than a perfect point, simply because light is a wave passing through a finite opening. The Rayleigh criterion is the standard definition of when two such points can still be told apart: they're 'just resolved' when the center of one point's Airy pattern lands on the first dark ring of the other's. That condition reduces to the closed form θ = 1.22λ ÷ D, where λ is the light's wavelength, D is the aperture's diameter, and the 1.22 factor comes from the first zero of the Bessel function describing the Airy pattern.

θ, in radians, is converted to arcseconds for readability (astronomers' conventional unit for angular resolution) and also turned into a linear distance: given how far away the target is, minimum resolvable separation = θ × distance, using the small-angle approximation that's always valid here since θ is minuscule for any real optical system.

The default 550nm wavelength is roughly the peak of human daytime visual sensitivity (green light) — a standard reference wavelength used throughout optics when no specific color is specified. Wavelength is entered in nanometers regardless of the unit toggle, the universal convention in optics worldwide; only the aperture diameter and target distance, which vary by instrument and by where you are, switch between metric and imperial.

FAQ

Why does a bigger telescope or lens resolve finer detail?

Because θ is inversely proportional to aperture diameter D — doubling the aperture halves the diffraction-limited angle. This is the fundamental reason large telescopes have large mirrors: beyond gathering more light, a bigger aperture is also fundamentally sharper, independent of any lens or mirror quality.

Does a real lens or telescope actually achieve this exact resolution?

This is the theoretical best case set purely by diffraction — a perfect, unobstructed, aberration-free optical system. Real instruments can fall short of it due to lens aberrations, atmospheric turbulence (for ground-based telescopes), sensor pixel size, or manufacturing imperfections, which is why 'diffraction-limited' is treated as an upper bound on performance to compare against, not a guarantee.

Related calculators